Al fine di migliorare la tua esperienza di navigazione, questo sito utilizza i cookie di profilazione di terze parti. Chiudendo questo banner o accedendo ad un qualunque elemento sottostante acconsenti all’uso dei cookie.

Deterministic vs. Stochastic Altruism

20 settembre 2018 ore 12:00 - 13:00

Aula 207, Sede di Viale Romania, 32

Speaker: Giovanni Ponti, Universidad de Alicante, LUISS


We report experimental evidence from a 3-person Dictator Game in which dictators decide over the distribution of probabilities of winning a fixed, indivisible, monetary prize. This evidence is compared with (i) a standard (control) treatment in which money is perfectly divisible and Dictators allocate shares of the prize across the group members, and also with (ii) a “hybrid” protocol by which a fraction of the prize is allocated deterministically, and the remainder by way of a lottery. Dictators’ decisions are framed within a (suitably modified version of) Karni and Safra (2002a)’s model of distributional justice. This allows us to identify consequentialist vs. procedural fairness, also controlling for (own-payo↵) risk aversion. Our evidence suggests that, among those not exhibiting a completely selfish behavior, both views of fairness are complementary in explaining dictators’ distributional decisions.